Small and Large Firm Performance Gaps in Indonesia: Evidences from the 1981–2008 Indonesian Manufacturing

  • Ari Kuncoro Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia
Keywords: liberalization, small firm, large firms, manufacturing, Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to examine the impacts of globalization on the performance gap between small and large firms in Indonesia, specifically in the manufacturing sector. First, the study addresses whether there are performance differentials between small and large firms, and if so, whether such gap is increasing while controlling for firm characteristics such as age, finance, export orientation, industry, and macroeconomic indicators. Second, the study discusses whether the opening of domestic market through trade and FDI liberalization affect firms disproportionately with respect to firm size. The study highlights such impacts amid successive economic reforms from 1986 to 1994. The empirical results suggest that opening the economy through market liberalization increased the productivity and wages gaps between large and small firms before it stabilized. Factors such as industrial agglomeration, financial access, export orientation have minimal impact on firms. The findings also suggest that while empirically, small firms benefit from more open trade regime after Asian financial crisis, the medium and large firms have more chance to benefit from the liberalization of the economy in general. Policy implications are also further explored.

References

Agarwal, R., & Audretsch, D. B. (2001). Does entry size matter? The impact of the life cycle and technology on firm survival. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 49(1), 21–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00136.

Amiti, M., & Konings, J. (2005). Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: Evidence from Indonesia. IMF Working Paper No. 05/146. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/Trade-Liberalization-Intermediate-Inputs-and-Productivity-Evidence-from-Indonesia-18377.

Bertschek, I. (1995). Product and process innovation as a response to increasing imports and foreign direct investment. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 43(4), 341–357. doi: 10.2307/2950548.

Bhaduri, S. N. (2005). Investment, financial constraints and financial liberalization: Some stylized facts from a developing economy, India. Journal of Asian Economics, 16(4), 704–718. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2005.06.001.

Braga, H., & Willmore, L. (1991). Technological imports and technological effort: an analysis of their determinants in Brazilian firms. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 39(4), 421–432. doi: 10.2307/2098441.

Caves, R. E., & Porter, M. E. (1977). From entry barriers to mobility barriers: Conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(2), 241–261. doi: 10.2307/1885416.

Evans, D. S. (1987). The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), 567-581. doi: 10.2307/2098588.

Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, G. R., & Petersen, B. C. (1988). Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, I, pp. 141-208. doi: 10.2307/2534426. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/1988/01/1988a bpea fazzari hubbard petersen blinder poterba.pdf.

Harris, J. R., Schiantarelli, F., & Siregar, M. G. (1994). The effect of financial liberalization on the capital structure and investment decisions of Indonesian manufacturing establishments. The World Bank Economic Review, 8(1), 17–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/8.1.17.

Hubbard, R. (1998). Capital-market imperfections and investment. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 193–225.

Kokko, A. (1994). Technology, market characteristics, and spillovers. Journal of Development Economics, 43(2), 279–293. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(94)90008-6.

Kuncoro, A. (2004). Bribery in Indonesia: some evidence from microlevel data. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 40(3), 329–354. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0007491042000231511.

Kuncoro, A. (2006). Decentralization and corruption in Indonesia: Manufacturing firms survival under decentralization. Working Paper Series Vol. 2006-25. The International Centre for the Study of East Asian Development.

Kuncoro, A. (2018). Trends in the Manufacturing Sector under the Jokowi Presidency: Legacies of Past Administrations. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 35(3), 402–424.

Pangestu, M., & Azis, I. J. (1994). Survey of recent developments. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 30(2), 3–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00074919412331336587.

Porter, M. E. (1979). The structure within industries and companies’ performance. Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(2), 214–227. doi: 10.2307/1924589.

Siregar, R. Y. (2001). Survey of recent developments. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 37(3), 277-303. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910152669127.

Takii, S. (2005). Productivity spillovers and characteristics of foreign multinational plants in Indonesian manufacturing 1990–1995. Journal of Development Economics, 76(2), 521–542. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.01.006.

Published
2020-01-20
How to Cite
Kuncoro, A. (2020). Small and Large Firm Performance Gaps in Indonesia: Evidences from the 1981–2008 Indonesian Manufacturing. Jurnal Ekonomi Indonesia, 8(1), 1-20. Retrieved from http://jurnal.isei.or.id/index.php/isei/article/view/10
Section
Articles