Main Article Content

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap pengaruh dari kenaikan tarif PPN ke 12% terhadap PDB dan tingkat kemiskinan di Indonesia dengan model CGE Statis serta memperkirakan potensi PPN yang belum direalisasikan oleh pemerintah Indonesia mengacu pada tabel Input-Output 2016. Hasil simulasi menemukan bahwa PDB nominal berpotensi turun sebesar 0,8% dan penduduk miskin diperkirakan naik sebesar 267.279 jiwa jika PPN naik menjadi 12%. Selain itu, nilai potensi PPN yang belum direalisasikan oleh pemerintah diestimasi sebesar Rp405,5–529,4 triliun per-tahunnya. Temuan ini memiliki implikasi bahwa pajak dapat mendistorsi kondisi sosial-ekonomi di Indonesia dan pemerintah sampai saat ini belum dapat memperoleh penerimaan PPN yang optimal.

Keywords

PPN analisis input output analisis CGE mikrosimulasi

Article Details

How to Cite
Tarmizi, M. M. (2023). Peningkatan Tarif PPN Indonesia: Dampak Sosial Ekonomi dan Potensi yang Belum Terserap. Jurnal Ekonomi Indonesia, 12(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.52813/jei.v12i1.169

References

  1. Amir, H., Asafu-Adjaye, J., & Ducpham, T. (2013). The impact of the Indonesian income tax reform: A CGE analysis. Economic Modelling, 31, 492-501. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.12.018.
  2. Auerbach, A. J. (1996). Measuring the impact of tax reform. National Tax Journal, 49(4), 665-673. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41789233.
  3. Bourguignon, F. (2003). The growth elasticity of poverty reduction: explaining heterogeneity across countries and time periods. In T. S. Eicher & S. J. Turnovsky (Eds.), Inequality and growth: Theory and policy implications, pp. 3-26. The MIT Press.
  4. BPS. (2015–2020). Produk domestik bruto (lapangan usaha). Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/subject/11/produk-domestik-bruto--lapangan-usaha-.html#subjekViewTab3.
  5. Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 7, 195-225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020139631000.
  6. Devarajan, S., Go, D. S., Lewis, J. D., Robinson, S., & Sinko, P. (1997). Simple general equilibrium modeling. In J. F. Francois & K. A. Reinert (Eds.), Applied methods for trade policy analysis: A handbook, pp. 156-183. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Eicher, T. S., Turnovsky, S. J., & Prunera, M. C. R. (2003). The impact of tax policy on inequality and growth: an empirical and theoretical investigation. In T. S. Eicher & S. J. Turnovsky (Eds.), Inequality and growth: Theory and policy implications, pp. 227-... The MIT Press.
  8. Engen, E., & Skinner, J. (1996). Taxation and economic growth. National Tax Journal, 49(4), 617-642. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41789231.
  9. Gemmell, N. (1988). Tax systems, tax revenue and growth in LDCs: A review of empirical evidence. Intereconomics, 23, 84-90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02927028.
  10. Kraay, A. (2006). When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countries. Journal of Development Economics, 80(1), 198-227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.02.004.
  11. Lee, Y., & Gordon, R. H. (2005). Tax structure and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5-6), 1027-1043. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.07.002.
  12. Lofgren, H., Harris, R. L., & Robinson, S. (2002). A standard computable general equilibrium (CGE) model in GAMS. Microcomputers in Policy Research, 5. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://www.ifpri.org/publication/standard-computable-general-equilibrium-cge-model-gams-0.
  13. Mendoza, E. G., Razin, A., & Tesar, L. L. (1994). Effective tax rates in macroeconomics: Cross-country estimates of tax rates on factor incomes and consumption. Journal of Monetary Economics, 34(3), 297-323. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(94)90021-3.
  14. OECD. (2020). Revenue statistics in Asian and Pacific economies 2020. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Publishing.
  15. Ravallion, M., & Chen, S. (1997). What can new survey data tell us about recent changes in distribution and poverty?. The World Bank Economic Review, 11(2), 357-382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/11.2.357.
  16. Resosudarmo, B. P., & Thorbecke, E. (1996). The impact of environmental policies on household incomes for different socio-economic classes: The case of air pollutants in Indonesia. Ecological Economics, 17(2), 83-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(95)00113-1.
  17. Son, H. H. (2004). A note on pro-poor growth. Economics Letters, 82(3), 307-314. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2003.08.003.
  18. Son, H. H., & Kakwani, N. (2008). Global estimates of pro-poor growth. World Development, 36(6), 1048-1066.
  19. Stokey, N. L., & Rebelo, S. (1995). Growth effects of flat-rate taxes. Journal of Political Economy, 103(3), 519-550. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/261993.
  20. Timmer, C. P. (2007). How Indonesia connected the poor to rapid economic growth. In T. Besley & L. J. Cord (Eds.), Delivering on the promise of pro-poor growth: insights and lessons from country experiences, pp. 29-57. A copublication of the World Bank and Palgrave Macmillan.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.